I agree that disagreeing in an agreeable manner is arguably more
agreeable than disagreeing in a disagreeable manner if one so chooses to disagree. But if the question is to agree about disagreeing or to disagree about agreeing I might have to disagree (agreeably, of course) just on principal in that I am, at my core, a disagreeable sort of person.
You don’t have to agree with me, but you should (if you want to be right).
So how does someone get to agree or disagree with you in an agreeable manner ifin they aren’t wanting to do it in front of the children so to speak? I’d like to communicate with ya pardna… but I don’t like everyone watchin… unless they pay for the privilege.
vérifiez votre email, mon frère
En termes spirituels qui pourraient voler … mon être considéré comme un frère … mais il ya pas grand chose de masculin mais peut-être me l’endurance des cellules de mon cerveau? LOL
this is how babblefish interpreted:
In spiritual terms that could fly … my be considered as a brother … but there is not much masculine but maybe my endurance of my brain cells? LOL
how close was the translation?
Pretty darn close. Looks like Babblefish might be tightening up some on the translations. I said specifically… “In spiritual terms… that might fly… my being considered a brother… but… there isn’t much masculine about me but perhaps the stamina of my brain cells?”
masculinity, paghhh! What’s it done for me lately.